Numerous people have written me criticizing the idea of rating spiritual teachers. Generally, they argue: I am in no position to judge "enlightened" people, that I am doing irreparable harm to seekers who discover that I gave their teacher a low ranking, or I can't possibly have devoted sufficient time to studying their (low-ranking) teacher.

Addressing each point in turn: If I didn't think I had a useful perspective, I wouldn't be writing. I can't tell anyone something they don't want to hear. One person's junk is, truly, another person's treasure.

I've spent the last fifteen plus years becoming a seeker and finder. Because of that, I am in a position to offer my thoughts on teachers I encounter. To those who find some affinity with my writing (and therefore my being), my thoughts will be of use. Those who do not will go on their way. I have no interest in convincing them of anything.

I welcome correspondence regarding teachers with whom I am unfamiliar. General comments are also appreciated. Please don't waste your time trying to convince me of the error of my ways. If you're a fan of one of my one-star teachers, build a website and tell others about your experience. That's the way to accomplish something.

For those of you who are still wondering, "who is this guy?" you can visit Poetryinmotionfilms.com to check out my documentary, the TAT Forum archives for writings by Shawn Nevins, or just Google me.

Questions, comments, and suggestions to: sanevins2 (at) yahoo.com